<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is consistency a good thing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digicynic.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/is-consistency-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digicynic.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/is-consistency-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>The wonderful of engagement planning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digicynic</title>
		<link>http://digicynic.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/is-consistency-a-good-thing/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Digicynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digicynic.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/is-consistency-a-good-thing/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong. I think the website Poke did is brilliant. The point I was trying to make (maybe not really clearly!) is that the website was a clever online translation of the interactive TV ad Mother created (which is a looping movie).
That all these pieces were consistent in their executions style (which is a good thing) but that they could have liberated the big idea (good things should never end) to bring something fresh and new to the party on other platforms.
It&#039;s such a big idea, I thought it was somehow a shame not to engage people with it more in-depth (maybe they did?).
A good example of what I mean by that is how Nike does it with &#039;put it where you want it&#039; or &#039;Joga bonito&#039;, creating a multitude of different content accross different media, all building up the big idea but using different executions on different medium to do so.
Does that make more sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I think the website Poke did is brilliant. The point I was trying to make (maybe not really clearly!) is that the website was a clever online translation of the interactive TV ad Mother created (which is a looping movie).<br />
That all these pieces were consistent in their executions style (which is a good thing) but that they could have liberated the big idea (good things should never end) to bring something fresh and new to the party on other platforms.<br />
It&#8217;s such a big idea, I thought it was somehow a shame not to engage people with it more in-depth (maybe they did?).<br />
A good example of what I mean by that is how Nike does it with &#8216;put it where you want it&#8217; or &#8216;Joga bonito&#8217;, creating a multitude of different content accross different media, all building up the big idea but using different executions on different medium to do so.<br />
Does that make more sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polaine</title>
		<link>http://digicynic.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/is-consistency-a-good-thing/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digicynic.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/is-consistency-a-good-thing/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I might not have understood what you mean correctly, but I think that the idea is really what is consistent across the media. In the sense that the concept of &quot;good things never ending&quot; has been executed in its own way across media, appropriate to that medium.

The website could have just been a looping movie, for example, but instead Poke used the scrolling nature of a webpage as opposed to a time-based metaphor. The rainbow is a consistent visual theme, but other than that the website takes on a very different look to the TV ads.

Maybe I&#039;m missing what you mean here though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might not have understood what you mean correctly, but I think that the idea is really what is consistent across the media. In the sense that the concept of &#8220;good things never ending&#8221; has been executed in its own way across media, appropriate to that medium.</p>
<p>The website could have just been a looping movie, for example, but instead Poke used the scrolling nature of a webpage as opposed to a time-based metaphor. The rainbow is a consistent visual theme, but other than that the website takes on a very different look to the TV ads.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing what you mean here though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
